MacCulloch, Diarmaid. 2003. The Reformation: A history. New York: Penguin.
I've been reading MacCulloch's history of the Reformation. It's a thick book, some 680 pages, and in a small typeface. So slow going but quite interesting.
I go to a Reformed church, and used to be a deacon in the PCA. I've studied a bit about the Reformation and thought that I knew a bit. But MacCulloch brings several strands together in a way that strikes me as relevant today.
Perhaps the Emergent (Protestant) Christians and their (Protestant) foes are correct and this "new way" is really revolutionizing the way that we think about faith.
Except that it's really just a reverse Reformation.
Not that it's a Counter-Reformation: that's a Roman Church's response to the original Reformers. (See the Encyclopædia Britannica article on the Counter-Reformation or the entry at the Catholic Encyclopedia.) It's not a reaction so much as the reverse of the original Reformation.
Take a look at MacCulloch's description of the Humanist's obsession with textual analysis: